This is the latest post in what I half-jokingly call The Kimberlin Saga®. If you are new to the story, that’s okay! Not
everyone reads my blog. The short
version is that Kimberlin has been harassing me for over a year, his worst
conduct being when he attempted to frame me for a crime. I recognize that this might sound like an
incredible claim, but I provide video and documentary evidence of that fact; in
other words, you don’t have to believe my word.
You only have to believe your eyes.
So, if you are new to the story, go to this page and you’ll be able to catch up on what has been happening.
Update: Now I have posted all the documents I intend to post in the
short term, let me update all of these posts with where you can find each. This is a generic update, so some of these
links will be to this post. My basic
motion to dismiss is here,
but it’s barely worth reading—it literally just says that the case should be
dismissed for all the reasons stated in my memorandum of points of authorities. So that memorandum is the meat, and that is here. Next I have a motion to require verification,
here,
and finally I have a memorandum
aimed at convincing a judge to let whoever Kimberlin Unmasked is preserve his/her/their
anonymity. And finally we see DB
Capital Stategies’ motion to dismiss.
And that is it, for now.
You are really, really going to
want to get out the popcorn for this one.
So I shared with you my motion
to dismiss and the
reasoning behind it, but I also pointed in my last post out that at this
stage we have to treat all of his proper allegations as true, which is annoying
because we are dealing with a convicted perjurer and indeed a shameless
liar. “Is there any way we can
communicate that to the judge?” you might ask, “Is there any way we can make
him face some real consequences if he keeps lying in this suit?”
Gosh, dear reader, you are asking
some good questions.
Humor aside, with all that in
mind, I present “Defendant Walker’s Motion to Require the Plaintiff to File
Verified Papers in Future Filings.” And
what does that mean? Well, I think you
will understand by the end of it.
Don’t let the length freak you
out. Most of this is just exhibits. The motion itself is 21 pages.
Now you will notice that towards
the end of the document, I have a couple video exhibits. Yeah, I had to burn them onto DVD’s—one for
the court and one for each of the mailings.
And for you good people, here’s what I embedded. Really, regular readers will find little of
this surprising.
Anyway, for your convenience,
this is Exhibit V, security footage from the January 9, 2012 incident where I supposedly
assaulted him:
And this is Exhibit W, an
interview Patrick Frey (aka Patterico) did with Glenn Beck:
By the way, since I spend a lot
of time in the motion comparing what happened on January 9, 2012, to what the
convicted terrorist and perjurer Brett Kimberlin says about it, perhaps you
would prefer this much better presentation of pretty much the same information
(and also introducing the world to Brett Kimberlin if you didn’t know about him
already):
Anyway, I will let the documents,
videos, etc. speak for themselves. The
facts have always been my friend in this.
Next up: what I filed in Maryland
State court on the same day. Really
Brett should have looked at a calendar before he filed this suit. He is going to have to respond to all these
documents right through Christmas. And
he has no one to blame for this, but his own stupid self.
---------------------------------------
Side bar: Given that lying to the FBI is obstruction of justice,
what did Brett do when he allegedly delivered a copy of his complaint to the
FBI? I mean, unless he said to them, “I
filed this, but really its bull____,” wouldn’t that be lying to the Feds? And yes, lying to the Feds is a crime. How do you think Martha Stewart got in
trouble, or Scooter Libby? It just isn’t
a predicate offense under RICO as a rule (with some exceptions).
---------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
I have accused some people,
particularly Brett Kimberlin, of
reprehensible conduct. In some cases, the conduct is even
criminal. In all cases, the only justice I want is through the
appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system. I do not want to see vigilante violence
against any person or any threat of such violence. This kind of conduct is not only morally
wrong, but it is counter-productive.
In the particular case of Brett
Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him. Do not call him. Do not write him a letter. Do not write him an email. Do not text-message him. Do not engage in any kind of directed
communication. I say this in part
because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want
that to happen to him.
And for that matter, don’t go on
his property. Don’t sneak around and try
to photograph him. Frankly try not to
even be within his field of vision. Your
behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to
mention trespass and other concerns).
And do not contact his
organizations, either. And most of all, leave his family alone.
The only exception to all that is
that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with
contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might
report. And even then if he tells you to
stop contacting him, obey that request. That
this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that
a person asks you to stop and you refuse.
And let me say something
else. In my heart of hearts, I don’t
believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above. But if any of you have, stop it, and if you
haven’t don’t start.
No comments:
Post a Comment